International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 73, Issue 1 , Pages 25-34 , February 2004

Assessing medical residents’ usage and perceived needs for personal digital assistants

  • James R Barrett

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Evaluation Sciences, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 800717, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1-434-924-8520; fax: +1-434-924-8437.
  • ,
  • Scott M Strayer

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Evaluation Sciences, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 800717, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
    • Department of Family Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
  • ,
  • Jane R Schubart

      Affiliations

    • Department of Health Evaluation Sciences, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 800717, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA

Received 21 August 2003 ,Revised 1 December 2003 ,Accepted 2 December 2003.

References 

  1. S.E. Labkoff, S. Shah, J. Bormel, Y. Lee, R.A. Greenes, The Constellation Project: experience and evaluation of personal digital assistants in the clinical environment, in: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care, 1995, pp. 678–682.
  2. Anonymous, Physician’s use of hand-helds increases from 15% in 1999 to 26% in 2001: Harris interactive poll results, Harris Poll. 8-24-2002 (electronic citation).
  3. American College of Physicians, ACP–ASIM survey finds nearly half of U.S. members use hand-held computers: ACP-ASIM press release, American College of Physicians, 9-3-2002 (electronic citation).
  4. Criswell DF, Parchman ML. Hand-held computer use in us family practice residency programs. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2002;9(1):80–86
  5. Alderson TS, Oswald NT. Clinical experience of medical students in primary care: use of an electronic log in monitoring experience and in guiding education in the Cambridge community based clinical course. Med. Educ. 1999;33(6):429–433
  6. Bird SB, Zarum RS. Is ED resident patient care documentation increased with the use of hand-held computerized devices?. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2001;8(5):492; (abstract)
  7. Garvin R, Otto F, McRae D. Using hand-held computers to document family practice resident procedure experience. Fam. Med. 2000;32(2):115–118
  8. Helwig AL, Flynn C. Using palm-top computers to improve students’ evidence-based decision making. Acad. Med. 1998;73(5):603–604
  9. Jerant AF. Training residents in medical informatics. Fam. Med. 1999;31(7):465–472
  10. Krippendorf RL, Simpson DE, Schiedermayer D. Promoting reflective teaching with personal digital assistants. Acad. Med. 1999;74(5):577
  11. Malan TK, Haffner WH, Armstrong AY, Satin AJ. Hand-held computer operating system program for collection of resident experience data. Obst. Gynecol. 2000;96(5 Pt. 1):792–794
  12. Pipas CF, Carney PA, Eliassen MS, Mengshol SC, Fall LH, Olson AL, et al. Development of a hand-held computer documentation system to enhance an integrated primary care clerkship. Acad. Med. 2002;77(7):600–609
  13. Beasley BW. Utility of palmtop computers in a residency program: a pilot study. South. Med. J. 2002;95(2):207–211
  14. Rao G. Introduction of hand-held computing to a family practice residency program. J Am. Board. Fam. Pract. 2002;15(2):118–122
  15. Tesch, Renata, Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools, Falmer Press, 1990.
  16. M.Q. Patton, Qualitative Evaluation Methods, Sage, Beverly Hills, 1980.
  17. Couper Mick P. Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches. Public Opin. Q. 2003;64:464–494

PII: S1386-5056(03)00210-7

doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2003.12.005

International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 73, Issue 1 , Pages 25-34 , February 2004