International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 75, Issue 5 , Pages 403-411, May 2006

A Bayesian model for triage decision support

  • Sarmad Sadeghi

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Health Information Sciences, 7000 Fannin, Suite 600, Houston, TX 77030, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +1 7135003940; fax: +1 7135003907.
  • ,
  • Afsaneh Barzi

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas Medical Branch, School of Medicine, Galveston, TX 77555, USA
  • ,
  • Navid Sadeghi

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
  • ,
  • Brent King

      Affiliations

    • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA

Received 1 December 2004; received in revised form 29 May 2005; accepted 17 July 2005.

Summary 

Objective

To compare triage decisions of an automated emergency department triage system with decisions made by an emergency specialist.

Methods

In a retrospective setting, data extracted from charts of 90 patients with chief complaint of non-traumatic abdominal pain were used as input for triage system and emergency medicine specialist. The final disposition and diagnoses of the physicians who visited the patient in Emergency Department (ED) as reflected in the medical records were considered as control. Results were compared by χ2-test and a binary logistic regression model.

Results

Compared to emergency medicine specialist, triage system had higher sensitivity (90% versus 64%) and lower specificity (25% versus 48%) for patients who required hospitalization. The triage system successfully predicted the Admit decisions made in the ED whereas the emergency medicine specialist decisions could not predict the ED disposition. Both triage system and emergency medicine specialist properly disposed 56% of cases, however, the emergency medicine specialist in this study under-disposed more patients than the triage system considering Admit disposition (p=0.004) while he appropriately discharged more patients compared to the triage system (p=0.017).

Conclusion

The triage system studied here shows promise as a triage decision support tool to be used for telephone triage and triage in the emergency departments. This technology may also be useful to the patients as a self-triage tool. However, the efficiency of this particular application of this technology is unclear.

Keywords: Triage, Bayesian network, Decision support system

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Parts of this paper – descriptive statistics and not analytical statistics – were presented at “Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 2002 Meeting (MMVR02)” in Newport Beach, CA in January 2002.

PII: S1386-5056(05)00143-7

doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.028

International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 75, Issue 5 , Pages 403-411, May 2006