International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 77, Issue 3 , Pages 184-193, March 2008

Clinicians’ perceptions about use of computerized protocols: A multicenter study

  • Shobha Phansalkar

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5750, USA
    • Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Administration Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 26 South 2000 East, Suite 5700 HSEB Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5750, USA. Tel.: +1 801 582 1565x2221; fax: +1 801 584 5640.
  • ,
  • Charlene R. Weir

      Affiliations

    • Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC), Veterans Administration Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
    • Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5750, USA
  • ,
  • Alan H. Morris

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5750, USA
    • Pulmonary Division, Department of Medicine, LDS Hospital and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
  • ,
  • Homer R. Warner

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-5750, USA

Received 5 September 2006; received in revised form 26 January 2007; accepted 5 February 2007.

Abstract 

Purpose

Implementation of evidence-based techniques, such as explicit computerized protocols, has achieved limited success among clinicians. In this study, we describe the development and validation of an instrument for assessing clinicians’ perceptions about use of explicit computerized protocols.

Methods

Qualitative assessment of semi-structured interviews with clinicians gave rise to a cognitive model evaluating the factors that motivate clinicians to use explicit computerized protocols. Using these constructs we developed a 35-item instrument which was administered to 240 clinicians (132 nurses, 53 physicians and 55 respiratory therapists), in three health-care institutions.

Results

Factor analysis identified nine factors that accounted for 66% of the total variance cumulatively. Factors identified were: Beliefs regarding Self-Efficacy, Environmental Support, Role Relevance, Work Importance, Beliefs regarding Control, Attitude towards Information Quality, Social Pressure, Culture, and Behavioral Intention. The strongest predictor was Beliefs regarding Self-Efficacy, which accounted for 26% of the total variance of intention to use explicit computerized protocols. Results supported the reliability and construct validity of the instrument.

Conclusions

Clinicians’ perceptions play a critical role in determining their intention to use explicit computerized protocols in routine clinical practice. Behavioral theories will help us understand factors predicting clinicians’ intention to use explicit computerized protocols and recognize the implications of these factors in the design and implementation of these protocols.

Keywords: Computerized protocols, Clinician perceptions, Implementation, Clinical protocols [MeSH], Decision making [MeSH], Factor analysis [MeSH]

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1386-5056(07)00030-5

doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.02.002

International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 77, Issue 3 , Pages 184-193, March 2008