International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 77, Issue 5 , Pages 315-323 , May 2008

A planning tool for multidisciplinary youth care evaluated: A case study

  • I.J. Baars

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Maastricht University/BEOZ, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 433881973.
    • ,
  • G.G. van Merode

Received 21 November 2005 ,Revised 3 April 2007 ,Accepted 13 June 2007.

References 

  1. van Merode GG, Groothuis S, Hasman A. Enterprise resource planning for hospitals. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2004;73(6):493–501
  2. Van Merode F, Molema H, Goldschmidt H. GUM and six sigma approaches positioned as deterministic tools in quality target engineering. Accreditation Qual. Assur. 2004;10:32–36
  3. Ammenwerth E, Gräber S, Herrmann G, Burkle T, König J. Evaluation of health information systems—problems and challenges. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2003;71(2–3):125–135
  4. Vandaele N, De Boeck L. Advanced resource planning. Adv. Resour. Plann. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2003;19:211–218
  5. Hofstede G. Management control of not-for profit activities. Account. Org. Soc. 1981;6:193–211
  6. Ammenwerth E, Brender J, Nykanen P, Prokosch H-U, Rigby M, Talmon J. Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems: reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2004;73(6):479–491
  7. van der Meijden MJ, Tange HJ, Troost J, Hasman A. Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2003;10(3):235–243
  8. Roth van A, Dierdonck van R. Hospital resource planning: concepts, feasibility and framework. Prod. Oper. Manage. 1995;4(1):2–29
  9. Grémy F, Bonnin M. Evaluation of automatic health information systems what and how. In:  Gennip EMSJv,  Talmon JL editor. Assessment and Evaluation of Information Technologies in Medicine. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1995;
  10. Beuscart-Zephir MC, Brender J, Beuscart R, Menager-Depriester I. Cognitive evaluation: how to assess the usability of information technology in healthcare. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 1997;54(1–2):19–28
  11. Ammenwerth E, Iller C, Mansmann U. Can evaluation studies benefit from triangulation? A case study. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2003;70:237–248
  12. Wyatt JC, Wyatt SM. When and how to evaluate health information systems?. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2003;69(2–3):251–259
  13. Govers MJG. Met ERP-systemen op weg naar moderne bureaucratieën? With ERP-systems to a modern bureaucracy? (in Dutch). Nijmegen: Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen; 2003;
  14. Arif M, Kulonda D, Jones J, Proctor M. Enterprise information systems: technology first or process first?. Business Process Manage. J. 2005;11(1):5–21
  15. Rose J, Kraemmergaard P. ERP systems and technological discourse shift: managing the implementation journey. Int. J. Acc. Inform. Syst. 2006;7(3):217–237
  16. van der Meijden MJ, Solen I, Hasman A, Troost J, Tange HJ. Two patient care information systems in the same hospital: beyond technical aspects. Methods Inform. Med. 2003;42(4):423–427
  17. Bozarth C. ERP implementation efforts at three firms. Integrating lessons from the SISP and IT-enabled change literature. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 2006;26(11):1223–1239
  18. Al-Mashari M, Al-Mudimigh A, Zairi M. Enterprise resource planning: a taxonomy of critical factors. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2003;146(2):352–364

PII: S1386-5056(07)00120-7

doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.06.005

International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 77, Issue 5 , Pages 315-323 , May 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution