International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 77, Issue 5 , Pages 324-335 , May 2008

An extension of trust and TAM model with IDT in the adoption of the electronic logistics information system in HIS in the medical industry

  • Feng-Cheng Tung

      Affiliations

    • Department of Business Administration, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan City 70101, Taiwan
    • Department of Finance, Diwan College of Management, 87-1 Nanshih Li, Madou, Tainan 72153, Taiwan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: No. 18, Lane 44, Section 4, Jinhua Road, West Central District, Tainan City 70059, Taiwan, ROC. Tel.: +886 920 333 756; fax: +886 6 2912983.
    • ,
  • Su-Chao Chang

      Affiliations

    • Department of Business Administration, National Cheng Kung University, 1 University Road, Tainan City 70101, Taiwan
    • ,
  • Chi-Min Chou

      Affiliations

    • Department of Marketing & Distribution Management, Tajen University, 20 Weishin Road, Yanpu Shiang, Pingtung 90741, Taiwan

Received 27 March 2006 ,Revised 14 June 2007 ,Accepted 14 June 2007.

References 

  1. Ammenwerth E, Gräber S, Herrmann G, Bürkle T, König J. Evaluation of health information systems—problems and challenges. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2003;71:125–135
  2. Reuss E, Menozzi M, Büchi M, Koller J, Krueger H. Information access at the point of care: what can we learn for designing a mobile CPR system?. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2004;73:363–369
  3. Bång M, Larsson A, Berglund E, Eriksson H. Distributed user interfaces for clinical ubiquitous computing applications. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2005;74:545–551
  4. Lu YC, Xiao Y, Sears A, Jacko JA. A review and a framework of handheld computer adoption in healthcare. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2005;74:409–422
  5. Smith AD, Manna DR. Exploring the trust factor in e-medicine. Online Inform. Rev. 2004;28:346–355
  6. Berglund M, Nilsson C, Révay P, Petersson G, Nilsson G. Nurses’ and nurse students’ demands of functions and usability in a PDA. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007;76:530–537
  7. Kluge EW. Secure e-health: managing risks to patient health data. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007;76:402–406
  8. Scott RE. e-Records in health—preserving our future. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007;76:427–431
  9. Croll PR, Croll J. Investigating risk exposure in e-health systems. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007;76:460–465
  10. Agrawal R, Johnson C. Securing electronic health records without impeding the flow of information. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007;76:471–479
  11. Sucurovic S. Implementing security in a distributed web-based EHCR. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007;76:491–496
  12. Knaup P, Garde S, Haux R. Systematic planning of patient records for cooperative care and multicenter research. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007;76:109–117
  13. Lacramioara S, Vasile S. Human–computer interaction reflected in the design of user interfaces for general practitioners. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2006;75:335–342
  14. F.D. Davis, A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-user Information System: Theory and Results, Ph.D. Dissertation, Cambridge, MA, MIT Sloan School of Management, 1986.
  15. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage. Sci. 1989;35:982–1002
  16. Ong CH, Lai JY, Wang YS. Factors affecting engineers’ acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies. Inform. Manage. 2004;41:795–804
  17. Luarn P, Lin HH. Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2005;21:873–891
  18. Closs DJ, Savitskie K. Internal and external logistics information technology integration. Int. J. Logist. Manage. 2003;14:63–76
  19. Gulati R, Garino J. Get the right mix of bricks and clicks. Harvard Bus. Rev. 2000;78:107–114
  20. Natesan CN. The impact of the Internet on health care services. J. Am. Acad. Bus. 2005;7:247–251
  21. Dutta-Bergman MJ. The impact of completeness and web use motivation on the credibility of e-health information. J. Commun. 2004;54:253–269
  22. Mukherji A, Mukherji J. Structuring organizations for the future: analyzing and managing change. Manage. Decis. 1998;36:265–273
  23. Feraud GJS. Improving strategic decision making in logistics information management—a framework. Logist. Inform. Manage. 1998;11:232–243
  24. Christopher M. Marketing Logistics. Oxford: Butterworth-Heineman; 1997;
  25. Murphy PR, Wood DF. Contemporary Logistics. 8th ed.. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 2004;
  26. Langley CJJ, Carlisle DP, Probst SB, Biggs DF, Cail RE. Microcomputers as a logistics information strategy. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manage. (Bradford). 1995;25:61–72
  27. Bowersox DJ, Closs DJ. Logistics Management. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.; 1996;
  28. Prindezis N, Kiranoudis CT. An internet-based logistics management system for enterprise chains. J. Food Eng. 2005;70:373–381
  29. Gunasekaran A, Ngai EWT. Information systems in supply chain integration and management. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004;159:269–295
  30. Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975;
  31. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1991;50:179–211
  32. Taylor S, Todd PA. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inform. Syst. Res. 1995;6:144–176
  33. Segars AH, Grover V. Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: a confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quart. 1993;17:517–525
  34. Chin WC, Todd PA. On the use, usefulness and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution. MIS Quart. 1995;19:237–246
  35. Doll WJ, Hendrickson A, Deng X. Using Davis's perceived usefulness and ease-of-use instruments for decision making: a confirmatory and multi-group invariance analysis. Decis. Sci. 1998;29:839–869
  36. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 2000;46:186–204
  37. Agarwal R, Karahanna E. Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart. 2000;24:665–694
  38. Karahanna E, Straub DW, Chervany NL. Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quart. 1999;23:183–213
  39. Rogers EM. The Diffusion of Innovation. 4th ed.. New York: Free Press; 1995;
  40. Agarwal R, Prasad JA. Conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Inform. Syst. Res. 1998;9:204–215
  41. Paré G, Trudelb MC. Knowledge barriers to PACS adoption and implementation in hospitals. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007;76:22–33
  42. Moore GC, Benbasat I. Development of instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inform. Syst. Res. 1991;2:192–222
  43. Chen LD, Gillenson ML, Sherrell DL. Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Inform. Manage. 2002;39:705–719
  44. Wu JH, Wang SC. What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Inform. Manage. 2005;42:719–729
  45. Wu JH, Wang SC, Lin LM. Mobile computing acceptance factors in the healthcare industry: a structural equation model. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007;76:66–77
  46. Doney PM, Cannon JP, Mullen MR. Understanding the influence of national culture on the development of trust. Acad. Manage. Rev. 1998;23:601–620
  47. Garbarino E, Johnson MS. The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. J. Mark. 1999;63:70–87
  48. Moorman C, Deshpande R, Zaltman G. Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. J. Mark. 1993;57:81–102
  49. Luhmann N. Trust and Power. Chichester, England: Wiley; 1979;
  50. Grabner-Kraeuter S. The role of consumers’ trust in online-shopping. J. Bus. Ethics. 2002;39:43–50
  51. Gefen D. What makes an ERP implementation relationship worthwhile: linking trust mechanisms and ERP usefulness. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 2004;21:263–288
  52. Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub D. Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quart. 2003;27:51–90
  53. Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub D. Inexperience and experience with online stores: the importance of TAM and Trust. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 2003;50:307–321
  54. Pavlou PA. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce—integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Electron. Commerce. 2003;7:69–103
  55. Saeed KA, Hwang Y, Yi MY. Toward an integrative framework for online consumer behavior research: a meta-analysis approach. J. End User Comput. 2003;15:1–26
  56. Wu IL, Chen JL. An extension of Trust and TAM model with TPB in the initial adoption of online tax: an empirical study. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2005;62:784–808
  57. Smith AD. Barriers to accepting e-prescribing in the USA. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 2006;19:158–180
  58. Mathieson K, Peacock E, Chin WW. Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources. Data Base Adv. Inform. Syst. 2001;32:86–112
  59. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decis. Sci. 1996;27:451–481
  60. Ding L, Velicer W, Harlow L. Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Struct. Equat. Model. 1995;2:119–143
  61. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation structural equation models. Acad. Mark. Sci. 1988;16:74–94
  62. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate Data Analysis with Reading. 3rd ed.. New York: Macmillan; 1992;
  63. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobervables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981;18:39–50
  64. Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 1980;80:594–606
  65. MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HW. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol. Methods. 1996;1:130–149
  66. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. Recent developments in structural equation modeling. J. Mark. Res. 1982;19(4):404–416
  67. Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 1980;88:588–606
  68. Tucker LR, Lewis C. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika. 1973;38:1–10
  69. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 1990;107:238–246
  70. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In:  Bollen KA,  Long JS editor. Testing Structural Equation Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1993;p. 136–162

PII: S1386-5056(07)00121-9

doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.06.006

International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 77, Issue 5 , Pages 324-335 , May 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution