From a conceptual problem-oriented electronic patient record model to running systems: A nationwide assessment

References 

1. Haux R, Knaup P, Bauer AW, Herzog W, Reinhardt E, Uberla K, et al. Information processing in healthcare at the start of the third Millennium: potential and limitations. Meth. Inf. Med. 2001;40(2):156–162
2. van der Meijden MJ, Tange HJ, Boiten J, Troost J, Hasman A. An experimental electronic patient record for stroke patients. Part 1. Situation analysis. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2000;58–59:111–125
3. van der Meijden MJ, Tange HJ, Boiten J, Troost J, Hasman A. An experimental electronic patient record for stroke patients. Part 2. System description. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2000;58–59:127–140
4. Tange HJ, Smeets RPHM. Information exchange between physicians and nurses. Comput. Meth. Prog. Biomed. 1994;43:261–267
5. Hier DR, Rothschild A, LeMaistre A, Keeler J. Differing faculty and housestaff acceptance of an electronic health record. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2005;74:657–662
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (90 KB)
6. Embi PJ, Yackel TR, Logan JR, Bowen JL, Cooney TG, Gorman PN. Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians?. J. Am. Med. Inform. Asooc. 2004;11:300–309
7. Rothschild AS, Dietrich L, Ball MJ, Wurtz H, Farish-Hunt H, Cortes-Comerer N. Leveraging systems thinking to design patient-centered clinical documentation systems. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2005;74:395–398
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (74 KB)
8. Knaup P, Garde S, Haux R. Systematic planning of patient records for cooperative care and multicenter research. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007;76:109–117
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (696 KB)
9. CEN/TC251/WG II – CONTsys Revision Task Force, Health informatics – systems of concepts to support continuity of care. Part 1. Basic concepts. prEN 13940-1, Stockholm, Swedish Standards Institute (final draft), 2006.
10. De Clercq E, Piette P, Strobbe J, Roland M, Vandenberghe A, Steenackers J, et al. Setting up a common architecture for EPR in primary care: the Belgian experience. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2002;90:215–219
    • MEDLINE
11. Salmon P, Rappaport A, Bainbridge M, Hayes G, Williams J. Taking the problem oriented medical record forward. In: Proc. AMIA Annu. Fall Symp.. 1996;p. 463–467
12. Tange HJ, Schouten HC, Kester ADM, Hasman A. The granularity of medical narratives and its effect on the speed and completeness of information retrieval. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 1998;5:571–582
    • MEDLINE
13. Rector AL, Nowlan WA, Kay S. Foundations for an electronic medical record. Meth. Inform. Med. 1991;30(3):179–186
14. Federal Public Service for Health, Food Chain Safety and Environment – Health informatics & Telematics Unit, Homologation de logiciels de gestion de dossiers patient, http://www.health.fgov.be/telematics (accessed June 2007).
15. The Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology, CCHIT Pilot Test Scripts – Ambulatory EHR 2006; 3 March 2006, http://www.cchit.org/work/criteria.htm.
16. Kay S, et al. SAPPHIRE: scenarios, architecture, and process. Comput. Meth. Prog. Biomed. 1994;43:217–225
17. NHS Information Authority, Requirements For Accreditation 99 v1.2, 2003.
18. Fernando B, et al. Prescribing safety features of general practice computer systems: evaluation using simulated test cases. BMJ. 2004;328:1171–1172