International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 77, Issue 6 , Pages 421-430, June 2008

A quantitative approach of using genetic algorithm in designing a probability scoring system of an adverse drug reaction assessment system

  • Yvonne Koh

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Republic of Singapore
  • ,
  • Chun Wei Yap

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Republic of Singapore
  • ,
  • Shu Chuen Li

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Republic of Singapore
    • Discipline of Pharmacy & Experimental Pharmacology, School of Biomedical Science, University of Newcastle, Australia
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Discipline of Pharmacy & Experimental Pharmacology, School of Biomedical Science, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia. Tel.: +61 2 49215921; fax: +61 2 49212044.

Received 10 January 2007; received in revised form 3 June 2007; accepted 19 August 2007. published online 30 January 2009.

Abstract 

Background

The detrimental effects of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are well established. Hence, precise and accurate assessment of ADRs’ causality which can differentiate signal from noise is crucial in screening, management and minimisation of ADRs.

Objective

The current study reported our attempt to improve the scoring system of a previously published algorithm of ADR assessment by our group using a genetic algorithm approach so that the final score can measure the probability of ADR causality.

Design

Using ADR cases obtained from the Centre for Drug Administration, the national centre for pharmacovigilance in Singapore, with known causality probability values as reference points, rules were developed to define possible combinations of criteria for ‘Definite’ ADR cases and ‘Probable’ ADR cases. A new scoring system was developed using these parameters with the help of genetic algorithm, and tested on 37 ‘Definite’ and 431 ‘Not Definite’ ADR cases. In addition, sensitivity and specificity analysis were performed to allow a comparison of performance between our algorithm and that used by the Adverse Drug Reaction Advisory Committee in Australia (ADRAC).

Results

The new scoring system is able to provide a probability of the causality of an ADR by a suspected drug. When applied to the ‘Definite’ and ‘Not Definite’ ADR reports, the new algorithm gave a sensitivity of 83.8% and specificity of 71.0%.

Conclusions

Using a quantitative method of assessing causality in the new algorithm allows rare and new ADRs to be more readily identified since a quantitative score can give a more precise degree of ADR causality. This scoring system that provides a probability score would help to make this algorithm more informative and assistive for clinicians, regulatory agencies or pharmaceutical companies to generate ADR alerts. The higher sensitivity value displayed by our algorithm also shows that it would be a good ADR screening tool.

Keywords: ADR causality, Genetic algorithm, ADR assessment, Probability scoring system

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1386-5056(07)00163-3

doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.08.010

International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 77, Issue 6 , Pages 421-430, June 2008