International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 77, Issue 5 , Pages 291-304 , May 2008

Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature

  • Kristiina Häyrinen

      Affiliations

    • University of Kuopio, Department of Health Policy and Management, Finland
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: University of Kuopio, Department of Health Policy and Management, P.O. Box 1627, FIN-70211 Kuopio, Finland. Tel.: +358 17162604.
    • ,
  • Kaija Saranto

      Affiliations

    • University of Kuopio, Department of Health Policy and Management, Finland
    • ,
  • Pirkko Nykänen

      Affiliations

    • University of Tampere, Department of Computer Sciences, Finland

Received 12 April 2006 ,Revised 22 June 2007 ,Accepted 13 September 2007.

References 

  1. Canada Health Infoway, 2007, available at: http://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/home/home.aspx, accessed June 13, 2007.
  2. HealthConnect 2006, available at: http://www.healthconnect.gov.au, accessed June 13, 2007.
  3. Connecting for Health 2007, available at: http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/, accessed June 13, 2007.
  4. Yasnoff WA, Humphreys BL, Overhage JM, et al. A consensus action agenda for achieving the national health information infrastructure. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2004;11(4):332–338
  5. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, National Definition and Implementation of the Electronic Patient Record System. Working Group Memorandum of the Ministry of Social affairs and Health, 2002 (in Finnish).
  6. European Commission 2004. e-Health—Making Healthcare Better for European Citizens: An Action Plan for a European e-Health Area, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/doc/qualif/health/COM_2004_0356_F_EN_ACTE.pdf, accessed June 13, 2007.
  7. European Commission 2006.Connected Health: Quality and Safety for European Citizens, available at http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/health/docs/policy/interoperability_report_final092006-cover.pdf, accessed June 13, 2007.
  8. Brender J, Nohr C, McNair P. Research needs and priorities in health informatics. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2000;58–59:257–289
  9. Haux R, Ammenwerth E, Herzog W, Knaup P. Health care in the information society. A prognosis for the year 2013. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2002;66(1–3):3–21
  10. Haux R. Health information systems—past, present, future. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2006;7(3–4):268–281
  11. Blobel B. Advanced and secure architectural EHR approaches. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2006;7(3–4):185–190
  12. Knaup P, Garde S, Merzweiler A, Graf N, Schilling F, Weber R, et al. Towards shared patient records: an architecture for using routine data for nationwide research. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2006;7(3–4):191–200
  13. Špidlen J, Hanzlíček P, Říha A, Zvárová J. Flexible information storage in MUDRII EHR. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2006;7(3–4):201–208
  14. Dostǎl C, Pavelka K, Zvárová J, Hanzlíček P, Olejárová M. Some principles of the development of a clinical database/national register of selected inflammatory rheumatic diseases in the Czech Republic. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2006;7(3–4):216–223
  15. van Ginneken AM. The computerized patient record: balancing effort and benefit. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2002;65(2):97–119
  16. Grimson J. Delivering the electronic healthcare record for the 21st century. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2001;64(2–3):111–127
  17. Thiru K, Hassey A, Sullivan F. Systematic review of scope and quality of electronic patient record data in primary care. BMJ. 2003;326(7398):1070–1072
  18. Ammenwerth E, de Keizer N. An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care trends in evaluation research 1982–2002. Meth. Inf. Med. 2005;44(1):44–56
  19. ISO/DTR 20514, Health Informatics – Electronic Health Record – Definition, Scope, and Context, 2004.
  20. Bryan S, Weatherburn G, Buxton M, Watkins J, Keen J, Muris N. Evaluation of a hospital picture archiving and communication system. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy. 1999;4(4):204–209
  21. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper F, Protopapas Z. Impact of filmless imaging on the frequency of clinician review of radiology images. J. Digit. Imag. 1998;11(3 Suppl. 1):149–150
  22. Weatherburn G, Bryan S, Cousins C. A comparison of the time required by radiologists for the preparation of clinico-radiological meetings when film and PACS are used. Eur. Radiol. 2000;10(6):1006–1009
  23. Benson M, Junger A, Quinzio L, et al. Influence of the method of data collection on the documentation of blood-pressure readings with an Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS). Meth. Inf. Med. 2001;40(3):190–195
  24. Essin DJ, Dishakjian R, deCiutiis VL, Essin CD, Steen SN. Development and assessment of a computer-based preanesthetic patient evaluation system for obstetrical anesthesia. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 1998;14(2):95–100
  25. Hollenberg JP, Pirraglia PA, Williams-Russo P, et al. Computerized data collection in the operating room during coronary artery bypass surgery: a comparison to the hand-written anesthesia record. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 1997;11(5):545–551
  26. Jordan DA, McKeown KR, Concepcion KJ, Feiner SK, Hatzivassiloglou V. Generation and evaluation of intraoperative inferences for automated health care briefings on patient status after bypass surgery. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2001;8(3):267–280
  27. Apkon M, Singhaviranon P. Impact of an electronic information system on physician workflow and data collection in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27(1):122–130
  28. Kari A, Ruokonen E, Takala J. Comparison of acceptance and performance of automated and manual data management systems in intensive care. Int. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 1990;7(3):157–162
  29. Menke JA, Broner CW, Campbell DY, McKissick MY, Edwards-Beckett JA. Computerized clinical documentation system in the pediatric intensive care unit. BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Mak. 2001;1(1):3
  30. Young JD, Goldfrad C, Rowan K. Development and testing of a hierarchical method to code the reason for admission to intensive care units: the INARC coding method. Intensive care national audit & research centre. Br. J. Anaesth. 2001;8(4):543–548
  31. Cimino JJ, Patel VL, Kushniruk AW. Studying the human–computer–terminology interface. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2001;8(2):163–173
  32. Schriger DL, Baraff LJ, Rogers WH, Cretin S. Implementation of clinical guidelines using a computer charting system. Effect on the initial care of health care workers exposed to body fluids. JAMA. 1997;278(19):1585–1590
  33. Hu SC, Yen DH, Kao WF. The feasibility of full computerization in the ED. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2002;20(2):118–121
  34. Kabir A, Hanson R, Mellis CM, van Asperen PP. Is asthma documentation improved by computer-facilitated data entry?. J. Qual. Clin. Pract. 1998;18(3):187–193
  35. Marill KA, Gauharou ES, Nelson BK, Peterson MA, Curtis RL, Gonzalez MR. Prospective, randomized trial of template-assisted versus undirected written recording of physician records in the emergency department. Ann. Emerg. Med. 1999;33(5):500–509
  36. Schriger DL, Baraff LJ, Buller K, et al. Implementation of clinical guidelines via a computer charting system: effect on the care of febrile children less than three years of age. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2000;7(2):186–195
  37. Hasman A, de Bruijn LM, Arends JW. Evaluation of a method that supports pathology report coding. Meth. Inf. Med. 2001;40(4):293–297
  38. Kent DL, Shortliffe EH, Carlson RW, Bischoff MB, Jacobs CD. Improvements in data collection through physician use of a computer-based chemotherapy treatment consultant. J. Clin. Oncol. 1985;3(10):1409–1417
  39. Kinn JW, O’Toole MF, Rowley SM, Marek JC, Bufalino VJ, Brown AS. Effectiveness of the electronic medical record in cholesterol management in patients with coronary artery disease (Virtual Lipid Clinic). Am. J. Cardiol. 2001;88(2):163–165A5
  40. Knight L, Yardley M, Jones A. The dangers resulting from inaccurate computer-based operative records. Br. J. Clin. Pract. 1991;45(1):41–42
  41. Lilford RJ, Bingham P, Bourne GL, Chard T. Computerized histories facilitate patient care in a termination of pregnancy clinic: the use of a small computer to obtain and reproduce patient information. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 1985;92(4):333–340
  42. Makoul G, Curry RH, Tang PC. The use of electronic medical records: communication patterns in outpatient encounters. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2001;8(6):610–615
  43. Milliken DL, Gervais AA. The impact of computerization on medication discrepancies in a centralized unit dose drug distribution system. Hosp. Pharm. 1990;25(7):650–652
  44. Schumock GT, Hutchinson RA, Bilek BA. Comparison of two systems for documenting pharmacist interventions in patient care. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1992;49(9):2211–2214
  45. Wagner MM, Hogan WR. The accuracy of medication data in an outpatient electronic medical record. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 1996;3(3):234–244
  46. Smith SA, Murphy ME, Huschka TR, et al. Impact of a diabetes electronic management system on the care of patients seen in a subspecialty diabetes clinic. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(6):972–976
  47. Hundt W, Adelhard K, Hundt C, et al. A computer-based reporting system in radiology of the chest. Eur. Radiol. 1998;8(6):1002–1008
  48. Rocha RA, Huff SM, Haug PJ, Evans DA, Bray BE. Evaluation of a semantic data model for chest radiology: application of a new methodology. Meth. Inf. Med. 1998;37(4–5):477–490
  49. Nielsen PE, Thomson BA, Jackson RB, Kosman K, Kiley KC. Standard obstetric record charting system: evaluation of a new electronic medical record. Obstet. Gynecol. 2000;96(6):1003–1008
  50. Nightingale PG, Adu D, Richards NT, Peters M. Implementation of rules based computerised bedside prescribing and administration: intervention study. BMJ. 2000;320(7237):750–753
  51. Chan LS, Schonfeld N. How much information is lost during processing? A case study of pediatric emergency department records. Comput. Biomed. Res. 1993;26(6):582–591
  52. Gibby GL, Schwab WK. Availability of records in an outpatient preanesthetic evaluation clinic. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 1998;14(6):385–391
  53. Marr PB, Duthie E, Glassman KS, et al. Bedside terminals and quality of nursing documentation. Comput. Nurs. 1993;11(4):176–182
  54. Movig KL, Leufkens HG, Lenderink AW, Egberts AC. Validity of hospital discharge International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes for identifying patients with hyponatremia. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2003;56(6):530–535
  55. Nahm R, Poston I. Measurement of the effects of an integrated, point-of-care computer system on quality of nursing documentation and patient satisfaction. Comput. Nurs. 2000;18(5):220–229
  56. Pryor TA. Computerized nurse charting. Int. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 1989;6(3):173–179
  57. Samore MH, Evans RS, Lassen A, et al. Surveillance of medical device-related hazards and adverse events in hospitalized patients. JAMA. 2004;291(3):325–334
  58. van Walraven C, Demers SV. Coding diagnoses and procedures using a high-quality clinical database instead of a medical record review. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2001;7(3):289–297
  59. Cheung NT, Fung V, Chow YY, Tung Y. Structured data entry of clinical information for documentation and data collection. Medinfo. 2001;10(Pt 1):609–613
  60. Bellika JG, Bones E, Hartvigsen G. PaSent—the patient's personal health adviser. J. Telemed. Telecare. 2002;8(Suppl. 2):41–43
  61. Mikkelsen G, Aasly J. Concordance of information in parallel electronic and paper based patient records. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2001;63(3):123–131
  62. Mikkelsen G, Aasly J. Manual semantic tagging to improve access to information in narrative electronic medical records. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2002;65(1):17–29
  63. Stausberg J, Koch D, Ingenerf J, Betzler M. Comparing paper-based with electronic patient records: lessons learned during a study on diagnosis and procedure codes. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2003;10(5):470–477
  64. Ehrenberg A, Birgersson C. Nursing documentation of leg ulcers: adherence to clinical guidelines in a Swedish primary health care district. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2003;17(3):278–284
  65. Nilsson G, Petersson H, Ahlfeldt H, Strender LE. Evaluation of three Swedish ICD-10 primary care versions: reliability and ease of use in diagnostic coding. Meth. Inf. Med. 2000;39(4–5):325–331
  66. Nilsson G, Ahlfeldt H, Strender LE. Textual content, health problems and diagnostic codes in electronic patient records in general practice. Scand. J. Prim. Health Care. 2003;21(1):33–36
  67. Okkes IM, Groen A, Oskam SK, Lamberts H. Advantages of long observation in episode-oriented electronic patient records in family practice. Meth. Inf. Med. 2001;40(3):229–235
  68. Porcheret M, Hughes R, Evans D, et al. Data quality of general practice electronic health records: the impact of a program of assessments, feedback, and training. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2004;11(1):78–86
  69. Pyper C, Amery J, Watson M, Crook C. Patients’ experiences when accessing their on-line electronic patient records in primary care. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2004;54(498):38–43
  70. Ward L, Innes M. Electronic medical summaries in general practice—considering the patient's contribution. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2003;53(489):293–297
  71. Petersson H, Nilsson G, Strender LE, Ahlfeldt H. The connection between terms used in medical records and coding system: a study on Swedish primary health care data. Med. Inf. Internet Med. 2001;26(2):87–99
  72. Aronsky D, Haug PJ. Assessing the quality of clinical data in a computer-based record for calculating the pneumonia severity index. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2000;7(1):55–65
  73. Hammer JS, Strain JJ, Friedberg A, Fulop G. Operationalizing a bedside pen entry notebook clinical database system in consultation-liaison psychiatry. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry. 1995;17(3):165–172
  74. Ho LM, McGhee SM, Hedley AJ, Leong JC. The application of a computerized problem-oriented medical record system and its impact on patient care. Int. J. Med. Inf. 1999;55(1):47–59
  75. Patel VL, Kushniruk AW, Yang S, Yale JF. Impact of a computer-based patient record system on data collection, knowledge organization, and reasoning. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2000;7(6):569–585
  76. Stausberg J, Lang H, Obertacke U, Rauhut F. Classifications in routine use: lessons from ICD-9 and ICPM in surgical practice. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2001;8(1):92–100
  77. Tang PC, LaRosa MP, Gorden SM. Use of computer-based records, completeness of documentation, and appropriateness of documented clinical decisions. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 1999;6(3):245–251
  78. Naszlady A, Naszlady J. Patient health record on a smart card. Int. J. Med. Inf. 1998;48(1–3):191–194
  79. DeLeo JM, Pucino F, Calis KA, Crawford KW, Dorworth T, Gallelli JF. Patient-interactive computer system for obtaining medication histories. Am. J. Hosp. Pharm. 1993;50(11):2348–2352
  80. Porter SC, Kohane IS. Optimal data entry by patients: effects of interface structure and design. Medinfo. 2001;10(Pt 1):141–145
  81. Porter SC, Silvia MT, Fleisher GR, Kohane IS, Homer CJ, Mandl KD. Parents as direct contributors to the medical record: validation of their electronic input. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2000;35(4):346–352
  82. Porter SC. Data acquisition in emergency medicine: electronic communication using free text. Pediatr. Emerg. Care. 2002;18(1):15–18
  83. Glen ES, Small DR, Morrison LM, Pollock K. Urological history-taking and management recommendations by microcomputer. Br. J. Urol. 1989;63(2):117–121
  84. Quaak MJ, Westerman RF, Schouten JA, Hasman A, van Bemmel JH. Appraisal of computerized medical histories: comparisons between computerized and conventional records. Comput. Biomed. Res. 1986;19(6):551–564
  85. Bischof F, Pfeiffer EF. Experiences with a computerized diabetes information system. Horm. Metab. Res. Suppl. 1992;26:146–148
  86. Meyerhoff C, Bischof F, Pfeiffer EF. Long-term experiences with a computerized diabetes management and glucose monitoring system in insulin-dependent diabetic patients. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 1994;24(1):1–7
  87. Bangsberg DR, Bronstone A, Hofmann R. A computer-based assessment detects regimen misunderstandings and nonadherence for patients on HIV antiretroviral therapy. AIDS Care. 2002;14(1):3–15
  88. Rabin JM, McNett J, Badlani GH. “Compu-Void II”: the computerized voiding diary. J. Med. Syst. 1996;20(1):19–34
  89. Rivellese AA, Ventura MM, Vespasiani G, et al. Evaluation of new computerized method for recording 7-day food intake in IDDM patients. Diabetes Care. 1991;14(7):602–604
  90. Jamison RN, Raymond SA, Levine JG, Slawsby EA, Nedeljkovic SS, Katz NP. Electronic diaries for monitoring chronic pain: 1-year validation study. Pain. 2001;91(3):277–285
  91. Brown SH, Miller RA, Camp HN, Guise DA, Walker HK. Empirical derivation of an electronic clinically useful problem statement system. Ann. Intern. Med. 1999;131(2):117–126
  92. Gray J, Orr D, Majeed A. Use of Read codes in diabetes management in a south London primary care group: implications for establishing disease registers. BMJ. 2003;326(7399):1130
  93. Pringle M, Ward P, Chilvers C. Assessment of the completeness and accuracy of computer medical records in four practices committed to recording data on computer. Br. J. Gen. Pract. 1995;45(399):537–541
  94. Ratelle S, Yokoe D, Blejan C, et al. Predictive value of clinical diagnostic codes for the CDC case definition of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID): implications for surveillance. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2003;30(11):866–870
  95. Stratmann WC, Goldberg AS, Haugh LD. The utility for audit of manual and computerized problem-oriented medical record systems. Health Serv. Res. 1982;17(1):5–26
  96. Studney DR, Hakstian AR. Effect of a computerized ambulatory medical record system on the validity of claims data. Med. Care. 1983;21(4):463–467
  97. Wilton R, Pennisi AJ. Evaluating the accuracy of transcribed computer-stored immunization data. Pediatrics. 1994;94(6 Pt 1):902–906
  98. Pabst MK, Scherubel JC, Minnick AF. The impact of computerized documentation on nurses’ use of time. Comput. Nurs. 1996;14(1):25–30
  99. Ammenwerth E, Eichstadter R, Haux R, Pohl U, Rebel S, Ziegler S. A randomized evaluation of a computer-based nursing documentation system. Meth. Inf. Med. 2001;40(2):61–68
  100. Daly JM, Buckwalter K, Maas M. Written and computerized care plans. Organizational processes and effect on patient outcomes. J. Gerontol. Nurs. 2002;28(9):14–23
  101. Ehnfors M, Florin J, Ehrenberg A. Applicability of the International Classification of Nursing Practice (ICNP) in the areas of nutrition and skin care. Int. J. Nurs. Terminol. Classif. 2003;14(1):5–18
  102. Holzemer WL, Henry SB. Computer-supported versus manually-generated nursing care plans: a comparison of patient problems, nursing interventions, and AIDS patient outcomes. Comput. Nurs. 1992;10(1):19–24
  103. Larrabee JH, Boldreghini S, Elder-Sorrells K, et al. Evaluation of documentation before and after implementation of a nursing information system in an acute care hospital. Comput. Nurs. 2001;19(2):56–65quiz 66–8
  104. Prophet CM. The evolution of a clinical database: from local to standardized clinical languages. Proc. AMIA Symp. 2000;660–664
  105. Kovner C, Schuchman L, Mallard C. The application of pen-based computer technology to home health care. Comput. Nurs. 1997;15(5):237–244
  106. VanDenKerkhof EG, Goldstein DH, Lane J, Rimmer MJ, Van Dijk JP. Using a personal digital assistant enhances gathering of patient data on an acute pain management service: a pilot study. Can. J. Anaesth. 2003;50(4):368–375
  107. Curl M, Robinson D. Hand-held computers in clinical audit: a comparison with established paper and pencil methods. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 1994;7(3):16–20
  108. Tange HJ, Hasman A, de Vries Robbe PF, Schouten HC. Medical narratives in electronic medical records. Int. J. Med. Inf. 1997;46(1):7–29
  109. Averill CB, Marek KD, Zielstorff R, Kneedler J, Delaney C, Milholland DK. ANA standards for nursing data sets in information systems. Comput. Nurs. 1998;16(3):157–161
  110. MedlinePlus, Medical Dictionary 2005, available at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/mplusdictionary.html, accessed April 3, 2006.
  111. Delone WH, McLean ER. Information system success: the quest for the dependent variable. ISR. 1992;3(1):60–95
  112. Van Der Meijden MJ, Tange HJ, Troost J, Hasman A. Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2003;10(3):235–243
  113. Delone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. JMIS. 2003;19(4):9–30

PII: S1386-5056(07)00168-2

doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.09.001

International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 77, Issue 5 , Pages 291-304 , May 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution