A cross-case analysis of technology-in-use practices: EPR-adaptation in Canada and Norway

References 

1. Kay S, Purves IN. Medical records and other stories: a narratological framework. Methods Inf. Med. 1996;35(2):72–87
   • MEDLINE
2. Berg M, Winthereik BR. Waiting for Godot: episodes from the history of patient records. In:  Berg M editors. Health Information Management. Routledge; 2003;p. 11–44
3. Collen M. A History of Medical Informatics in the United States 1950–1990. Washington, DC: American Medical Informatics Association; 1995;
4. Berg M. Implementing Information Systems in Healthcare Organizations: Myths and Challenges. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2001;64:143–156
   • Abstract
   • Full Text
   • Full-Text PDF (118 KB)
   • CrossRef
5. Dick RS, Gabler J. Still searching for the Holy Grail. Health Manage. Technol. 1995;16(2):30–35
6. Jensen TB, Aanestad M. How Healthcare professionals ‘make sense’ of an electronic patient record adoption. Inform. Syst. Manage. 2007;24(1):29–42
7. Nilsson A, Grisot M, Aanestad M. Electronic patient records: an information infrastructure for healthcare. In: Proceedings of the 25th Conference in Information System Research in Scandinavian (IRIS). Bautahøj, Denmark. 2002;
8. Ellingsen G, Monteiro E. A patchwork planet integration and cooperation in hospitals. Comput. Support Coop. Work. 2003;12(1):71–95
9. Bates D. The quality case for information technology in healthcare. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2002;2(7):
10. Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach. Int. J. Med. Inform. 1999;55:87–101
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (103 KB)
    • CrossRef
11. Heath C, Luff P, Svensson MS. Technology and medical practice. Social health Illn. 2003;25:75–96
12. Aarts J, Ash J, Berg M. Extending the understanding of computerized physician order entry: implications for professional collaboration, workflow and quality of care. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007;76:4–13
13. Suchman L. Plans and Situated Actions. The Problem of Human Machine Communication. 1st ed.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987;
14. Berg M. Rationalizing Medical Work: Decision-Support Techniques and Medical Practices. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1997;
15. Wikkelsø S. Subtle redistribution of work, attention and risk: electronic patient records and organisational consequences. SJIS. 2005;17(1):3–30
16. Orlikowski WJ, Gash DC. Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM TOIS. 1994;12(2):174–207
17. Stoop A, Bal R, Berg M. OZIS and the politics of safety: using ICT to create a regionally accessible patient medication record. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007;76:229–235
18. Rolland K. The Boomerang Effect: uncovering the unintended side effects of IT in global organizations. In:  Ess C,  Thorseth M editor. Technology in a Multicultural and Global Society. 2005;
19. Schön D. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, Basic Books. United States of America: A Division of Harper Collins Publishers; 1983;
20. Boulus N, Bjørn P. Constructing technology-in-use practices: EPR-adaptation in Canada and Norway. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2007;130:143–155
21. Hartswood M, Proctor R, Rouncefield M, Slack R. Making a case in medical work: implications for electronic medical record. Comput. Support Coop. Work. 2003;12(3):241–266
22. Myers M, Avison D. Qualitative Research in Information Systems: A Reader. London: Sage Publications; 2002;
23. Walsham G. Interpreting Information Systems in Organizations. Chichester: John Wiley; 1993;
24. Riet Av, Berg M, Hiddema F, Sol K. Meeting patients’ needs with patient information systems: potential benefits of qualitative research methods. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2001;64:1–14
    • Abstract
    • Full Text
    • Full-Text PDF (137 KB)
    • CrossRef
25. Hanseth O, Jacussi E, Grisot M, Aanestad M. Reflexive standardization: side-effects and complexity in standard making. MISQ. 2006;30(Special issue on Standard Making):563–581
26. British Columbia Medical Association: Getting IT rights. Patient centred information technology. Available at http://www.bcma.org/public/news_publications/policy_papers/ITPaper/GettingITRight.htm.
27. N. Boulus, Managing the gradual transition from paper to electronic patient records (EPR), University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, http://www.duo.uio.no/publ/informatikk/2004/18415/finalThesis.pdf, 2004.
28. Eisenhardt KM. Building theories from case study research. AMR. 1989;14(4):532–550
29. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine De Gruyter; 1967;
30. Bjørn P, Scupola A, Fitzgerald B. Expanding technological frames towards mediated collaboration: groupware adoption in virtual learning teams. SJIS. 2006;18(2):3–42
31. DeSanctis G, Poole MS. Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: adaptive structuration theory. Organ. Sci. 1994;5(2):121–147
32. Goffman E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, New York: Doubleday; 1959;
33. Kiesler S. Thinking ahead: the hidden messages in computer networks. HBR. 1986;1:46–60