International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 79, Issue 6 , Pages e135-e143 , June 2010

A longitudinal study of usability in health care: Does time heal?

Received 31 October 2007 ,Revised 6 July 2008 ,Accepted 9 July 2008.

References 

  1. Allen B. Cognitive abilities and information system usability. Information Processing and Management. 1994;30:177–191
  2. Bailey RW, Allan RW, Riello P. Usability testing vs. heuristic evaluation: a head-to-head comparison. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 36th Annual Meeting. HFES; 1992;p. 409–413
  3. Bednarik R, Tukiainen M. Effects of Display Blurring on the Behavior of Novices and Experts During Program Debugging. Extended Abstracts of CHI 2005. New York: ACM; 2005;pp. 1204–1207
  4. Bourie PQ, Dresch J, Chapman RH. Usability evaluation of an on-line nursing assessment. In: Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. 1997;
  5. A. Dillon, M. Song. An empirical comparison of the usability for novice and expert searchers of a textual and a graphic interface to an art-resource database. Journal of Digital Information, 1 (1) (1997). http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/issue/view/1 (accessed July 5, 2008).
  6. Dix A, Finlay J, Abowd GD, Beale R. Human–Computer Interaction. 3rd ed.. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited; 2004;
  7. Frøkjær E, Hertzum M, Hornbæk K. Measuring usability: are effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction really correlated?. CHI Letters. 2000;2(1):345–352
  8. Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In:  Hancock PA,  Meshkati N editor. Human Mental Workload. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers; 1988;p. 139–183
  9. Ishii N, Miwa K. Interactive processes between mental and external operations in creative activity: a comparison of experts’ and novices’ performance. In: Proceedings of the Fourth conference on Creativity & cognition table of contents. ACM: New York; 2002;p. 178–185
  10. Jacobsen NE, Hertzum M, John BE. The evaluator effect in usability tests. In: Proceedings of the CHI’98. New York: ACM Press; 1998;
  11. Karat CM, Campbell R, Fiegel T. Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation. In: Proceedings of the CHI’92. New York: ACM Press; 1992;p. 397–404
  12. Kjeldskov J, Skov MB. Exploring context-awareness for ubiquitous computing in the healthcare domain. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 2007;11(7):549–562
  13. Molich R. Usable Web Design. Ingeniøren|bøger; 2000;(in Danish)
  14. J. Nielsen (2000). Novice vs. Expert Users. Alertbox. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20000206.html (February 6, 2000).
  15. Nielsen J. Usability Engineering. San Diego: Morgan Kaufmann; 1993;
  16. Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H. Interaction Design: Beyond Human–Computer Interaction. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2002;
  17. Prümper J, Frese M, Zapf D, Brodbeck FC. Errors in computerized office work: differences between novice and expert users. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin. 1991;23(2):63–66
  18. Rubin J. Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design and Conduct Effective Tests. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 1994;
  19. Urokohara H, Tanaka K, Furuta K, Honda M, Kuros M. NEM: “Novice Expert ratio Method” A Usability Evaluation Method to Generate a New Performance Measure. Extended Abstracts of CHI 2000. New York: ACM; 2000;pp. 185–186

PII: S1386-5056(08)00123-8

doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.07.008

International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 79, Issue 6 , Pages e135-e143 , June 2010