Towards automated processing of clinical Finnish: Sublanguage analysis and a rule-based parser

References 

1. Friedman C, Hripcsak G. Natural language processing and its future in medicine. Academic Medicine. 1999;74(8):890–895
2. C. Friedman, S. Johnson, Natural language and text processing in biomedicine, in: Biomedical Informatics, Springer, 2006, pp. 312–343.
3. Laippala V, Ginter F, Pyysalo S, Salakoski T. Resource-efficient construction of a full parser for Finnish nursing narratives. In: Proceedings of Louhi’08. Turku, Finland. 2008;p. 34–53
4. Suominen H, Lehtikunnas T, Back B, Karsten H, Salakoski T, Salanterä S. Applying language technology to nursing documents: pros and cons with a focus on ethics. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2007;76S2:293–301
5. Huang Y, Lowe HJ. A novel hybrid approach to automated negation detection in clinical radiology reports. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2007;14(3):304–311
6. Huang Y, Lowe HJ, Klein D, Cucina RJ. Improved identification of noun phrases in clinical radiology reports using a high-performance statistical natural language parser augmented with the UMLS Specialist Lexicon. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2005;12(3):275–285
7. L.M. Christiansen, P.J. Haug, M. Fiszman, Mplus: a probabilistic medical language understanding system, in: Proceedings of the Workshop on Natural Language Processing in the Biomedical Domain, July 2002, Association for Computational Linguistics, 2002, pp. 29–36.
8. Haug P, Christensen L, Gundersen M, Clemons B, Koehler S, Bauer K. A natural language parsing system for encoding admitting diagnoses. In: Proceedings of AMIA Symposium. 1997;p. 4–8
9. Hripcsak G, Friedman C, Alderson P, et al. Unlocking clinical data from narrative reports: a study of natural language processing. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1995;22(9):681–688
10. Koskenniemi K. Two-level model for morphological analysis. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1983;p. 683–685
11. Friedman C, Kra P, Rzhetsky A. Two biomedical sublanguages: a description based on the theories of zellig harris. Journal of Biomedical informatics. 2002;35(4):222–234
    • MEDLINE
    • CrossRef
12. Friedman C. Sublanguage text processing—application to medical narrative. In:  Grishman R,  Kittredge R editor. Analyzing Language in Restricted Domains. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1986;p. 85–102
13. Karvinen K. Hoitokertomusten kieli kotihoidossa. In: Kielitieteen päivät, 2007. 2007;p. 129–130
14. Harris Z. Mathematical Structures of Language. New York Interscience Publishers; 1968;
15. Harris Z. Theory of Language and Information a Mathematical Approach. Oxford Clarendon Press; 1991;
16. Fitzpatrick E, Bachenko J, Hindle D. The status of telegraphic sublanguages. In:  Grishman R,  Kittredge R editor. Analyzing Language in Restricted Domains. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1986;p. 39–52
17. Copestake A. Implementing Typed Feature Structure Grammars. Stanford, CA: CSLI; 2002;
18. Pollard C, Sag IA. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. University of Chicago Press and CSLI Publications; 1994;
19. Pyysalo S, Aubin S, Nazarenko A, Salakoski T. Lexical adaptation of Link Grammar to the biomedical sublanguage: a comparative evaluation of three approaches. In: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Semantic Mining in Biomedicine (SMBM’06). 2006;p. 60–67
20. Beesley KB, Karttunen L. Finite State Morphology. CSLI Publications; 2003;
21. de Marneffe MC, MacCartney B, Manning C. Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses.. In: Proceedings of LREC’06. 2006;p. 449–454
22. E. Black, et al., A procedure for quantitatively comparing the syntactic coverage of english grammars, in: Proceedings of the Fourth DARPA Speech and Natural Language Workshop, 1991, pp. 306–312.
23. Karlsson F. Constraint grammar as a framework for parsing unrestricted text. In: Proceedings of COLING’90. 1990;p. 168–173