International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 78, Issue 10 , Pages 679-687, October 2009

Evaluation of nursing-specific drug information PDA databases used as clinical decision support tools

  • Hyla H. Polen

      Affiliations

    • Nova Southeastern University, College of Pharmacy, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, United States
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Nova Southeastern University, College of Pharmacy – West Palm Beach, 1630 Tamarack Way, Wellington, FL 33414, United States. Tel.: +1 561 222 4643; fax: +1 561 627 0972.
  • ,
  • Kevin A. Clauson

      Affiliations

    • Nova Southeastern University, College of Pharmacy – West Palm Beach, Pharmacy Practice Department, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, United States
  • ,
  • Wendy Thomson

      Affiliations

    • Nova Southeastern University, College of Allied Health and Nursing, Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States
  • ,
  • Antonia Zapantis

      Affiliations

    • Nova Southeastern University, College of Pharmacy, Pharmacy Practice Department, Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States
  • ,
  • Jennie Q. Lou

      Affiliations

    • Nova Southeastern University, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States

Received 3 February 2009; received in revised form 6 May 2009; accepted 19 June 2009. published online 29 July 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Nursing is arguably the most organizationally diverse healthcare profession. Educational backgrounds may vary, even among similarly credentialed nurses. Drug information databases used as clinical decision support tools can improve access to pharmacologic information at point-of-care when housed on personal digital assistants. They may also help address the disparity in drug information and pharmacology education between nurses.

Objectives

To evaluate nursing-specific drug information database content on personal digital assistants (PDAs).

Methods

Seven nursing-specific PDA databases were evaluated for scope (absence or presence of an answer) and completeness (three-point scale) via the use of 80 general category and 80 subspecialty drug information questions. Erroneous information was also tracked. Individual scope and completeness scores were delineated by rank order and chi square was performed to determine differences in scope and completeness scores between the databases.

Results

Davis's Drug Guide for Nurses (DDGN) and Nursing Lexi-Drugs (NLD) tied for the highest scores for scope, including each answering 72.5% of the 160 evaluation questions. No significant differences existed between their scores and those earned by Nursing2008 Drug Handbook (p<0.05). The highest scores for completeness were earned by NLD with 58.1% and DDGN at 57.1%. Saunders Nursing Drug Handbook was the only database that showed a significantly lower score in completeness as compared to the other six databases (p<0.05). A 4.2% overall error rate was found among database answers.

Discussion

Significant differences were found among the performances in the databases evaluated in this study for their ability to answer commonly encountered drug information issues in nursing practice. All databases contained some erroneous information and even the top performers failed to provide answers to more than one-fourth of the questions posed. The availability of accurate and timely drug information at point-of-care can play a vital role in patient management and outcomes, but current resources that are available need to be improved.

Keywords: Clinical decision support tools, Nursing, Personal digital assistant, Drug information

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 The methodology of this project was presented at the 2007 American Medical Informatics Association Meeting and the results were presented at the 2008 Nursing Symposium.

PII: S1386-5056(09)00099-9

doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.06.003

International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 78, Issue 10 , Pages 679-687, October 2009