International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 78, Issue 12 , Pages 808-814 , December 2009

Norwegians GPs’ use of electronic patient record systems

  • Tom Christensen

      Affiliations

    • Norwegian EHR Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim, MTFS, 7489 Trondheim, Norway
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +47 91165970; fax: +47 73551530.
  • ,
  • Arild Faxvaag

      Affiliations

    • Norwegian EHR Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim, MTFS, 7489 Trondheim, Norway
  • ,
  • Hallvard Lærum

      Affiliations

    • Rikshospitalet-Radiumhospitalet HF Medical Centre, Rikshospitalet, 0027 Oslo, Norway
  • ,
  • Anders Grimsmo

      Affiliations

    • Norwegian EHR Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim, MTFS, 7489 Trondheim, Norway

Received 23 July 2008 ,Revised 14 July 2009 ,Accepted 20 August 2009.

References 

  1. Rector AL, Nowlan WA, Kay S. Foundations for an electronic medical record. Methods Inf. Med. 1991;30(August (3)):179–186
  2. Shortliffe EH, Perreault LE, Wiederhold G, Fagan LM. In:  Hannah KJ,  Ball MJ editor. Medical Informatics: Computer Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. Second ed.. New York: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.; 2001;
  3. Berner E, Detmer D, Simborg D. Will the wave finally break? A brief view of the adoption of electronic medical records in the United States. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2005;2(January–February (1)):3–7
  4. Jha A, Ferris T, Donelan K, Desroches C, Shields A, Rosenbaum S, et al. How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence. Health Aff. 2006;25(November–December (6)):496–507
  5. Menachemi N, Brooks RG. EHR and other IT adoption among physicians: results of a large-scale statewide analysis. J. Healthc. Inf. Manag. 2006;20(Summer (3)):79–87
  6. Lium JT, Faxvaag A. Removal of paper-based health records from Norwegian hospitals: effects on clinical workflow. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2006;124:1031–1036
  7. Ford EW, Menachemi N, Phillips MT. Predicting the adoption of electronic health records by physicians: when will health care be paperless?. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2006;13(January–February (1)):106–112
  8. Russell S, Spooner S. Barriers to EMR adoption in internal medicine and pediatric outpatient practices. Tenn. Med. 2004;97(October (10)):457–460
  9. Ellingsen G, Monteiro E. Big is beautiful: electronic patient records in large Norwegian hospitals 1980s–2001. Methods Inf. Med. 2003;42(4):366–370
  10. Lærum H, Ellingsen G, Faxvaag A. Doctors’ use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: cross sectional survey. BMJ. 2001;323(December (7325)):1344–1348
  11. Bassoe CF, Sorli WG. ADP in general practice. Tidsskr. Nor Laegeforen. 1983;103(May (15)):1270–1275
  12. Bjørndal A, Maarmann-Moe K. Automatic data processing in primary health care. Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen. 1993;113(April (10)):1236–1250
  13. Nilsen JF, Fosse S. A computerized medical record system for primary health care. Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen. 1982;102(September (25)):1285–1288
  14. Hasvold T. A computerized medical record. “The Balsfjord system”. Scand. J. Prim. Health Care. 1984;2(September (3)):125–128
  15. Johnson C, Johnson T, Zhang J. A user-centered framework for redesigning health care interfaces. J. Biomed. Inform. 2005;38(February (1)):75–87
  16. Koch S. Designing clinically useful systems: examples from medicine and dentistry. Adv. Dent. Res. 2003;17(December (1)):65–68
  17. Valnes KN, Aarseth HP. A user evaluation of software programs in family practice. Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen. 1995;115(January (2)):230–233
  18. Meyer I. Benchmarking IT Use Among General Practitioners in Europe. Bonn: European Commission, Information Society and Media Directorate General; 2008;p. 116
  19. Laerum H, Faxvaag A. Task-oriented evaluation of electronic medical records systems: development and validation of a questionnaire for physicians. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2004;4:1
  20. Lium JT, Lærum H, Schulz T, Faxvaag A. From the front line, report from a near paperless hospital: mixed reception among health care professionals. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2006;13(November–December (6)):668–675
  21. Protti D, Wright G, Treweek S, Johansen I. Primary care computing in England and Scotland: a comparison with Denmark. Inform. Prim. Care. 2006;14(2):93–99
  22. Christensen T, Grimsmo A. Expectations for the next generation of electronic patient records in primary care: a triangulated study. Inform. Prim. Care. 2008;16(1):21–28
  23. Covell DG, Uman GC, Manning PR. Information needs in office practice: are they being met?. Ann. Intern. Med. 1985;103(October (4)):596–599
  24. Simon JS, Rundall TG, Shortell SM. Drivers of electronic medical record adoption among medical groups. Jt. Comm. J. Qual. Patient Saf. 2005;31(November (11)):631–639
  25. Protti D. Comparison of information technology in general practice in 10 countries. Healthc. Q. 2007;10(2):107–116
  26. Heeks R. Health information systems: failure, success and improvisation. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2006;75(February (2)):125–137
  27. Strasberg HR, Tudiver F, Holbrook AM, Geiger G, Keshavjee KK, Troyan S. Moving towards an electronic patient record: a survey to assess the needs of community family physicians. In: Proceedings of the AMIA Symposium. 1998;
  28. Wyatt JC, Wyatt SM. When and how to evaluate health information systems?. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2003;69(March (2–3)):251–259
  29. Christensen T, Grimsmo A. Instant availability of patient records, but diminished availability of information: a multi-method study of GPs use of electronic patient records. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2008;8(March (12)):
  30. Vedvik E, Faxvaag A. The fate of clinical department systems at the dawn of hospital-wide Electronic health records in a Norwegian university hospital. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2006;124:298–303
  31. Valdes I, Kibbe DC, Tolleson G, Kunik ME, Petersen LA. Barriers to proliferation of electronic medical records. Inform. Prim. Care. 2004;12(1):3–9
  32. Laerum H, Karlsen TH, Faxvaag A. Effects of scanning and eliminating paper-based medical records on hospital physicians’ clinical work practice. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2003;10(November–December (6)):588–595
  33. Bomba D. A comparative study of computerised medical records usage among general practitioners in Australia and Sweden. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 1998;52(Pt 1):55–59
  34. Ammenwerth E, Gräber S, Herrmann G, Bürkle T, König J. Evaluation of health information systems—problems and challenges. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2003;71(September (2–3)):125–135
  35. Kuhn KA, Giuse DA. From hospital information systems to health information systems. Methods Inf. Med. 2001;40(4):275–287

PII: S1386-5056(09)00128-2

doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.08.004

International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 78, Issue 12 , Pages 808-814 , December 2009