International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 78, Issue 12 , Pages 839-849 , December 2009

A quantitative analysis of the impact of a computerised information system on nurses’ clinical practice using a realistic evaluation framework

  • Cristina Oroviogoicoechea

      Affiliations

    • Nursing Research and Innovation Unit, Clinica Universitaria, Universidad de Navarra, 31080 Pamplona, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +34 626512815; fax: +34 948296500.
  • ,
  • Roger Watson

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Health & Social Care Studies and Service Development, School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S5 7AU, UK
    • Tel.: +44 114 226 9624.

Received 1 October 2008 ,Revised 31 August 2009 ,Accepted 31 August 2009.

References 

  1. Oroviogoicoechea C, Elliott B, Watson R. Review: evaluating information systems in nursing. J. Clin. Nurs. 2008;17(5):567–575
  2. Urquhart C, Currell R. Reviewing the evidence on nursing record systems. Health Informatics J. 2005;11(1):33–44
  3. Bostrom AC, Schaffer P, Dontje K, Pohl JM, Nagelkerk J, Cavanagh SJ. Electronic health record. Implementation across the Michigan Academic Consortium. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 2006;24:44–52
  4. Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organisations: myths and challenges. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2001;64:143–156
  5. Kaplan B, Shaw NT. Future directions in evaluation research: people, organizational and social issues. Methods Inf. Med. 2004;43:215–231
  6. Ammenwerth E, Graber S, Herrmann G, Burkle T, Konig J. Evaluation of health information systems—problems and challenges. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2003;71:125–135
  7. Van der Meijden MJ, Tange HJ, Hasman A. Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2003;10:235–243
  8. Heathfield HA. Evaluating clinical systems: the social programme perspective. Health Informatics J. 2001;7:8–12
  9. Carlsson SA. Advancing information systems evaluation (research): a critical realist approach. Electron. J. Inform. Syst. Eval. 2003;6(2):11–20
  10. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage Publications Ltd.; 1997;
  11. Connelly JB. Evaluating complex public health interventions: theory, methods and scope of realist enquiry. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 2007;13:935–941
  12. Clarke A. Evaluation Research. An Introduction to Principles, Methods and Practice. London: Sage Publications Ltd.; 1999;
  13. Leca B. Naccache PA, critical realist approach to institutional entrepreneurship. Organization. 2006;13(5):627–651
  14. Reed M. Reflections on the “realist turn” in organisation and management studies. J. Manage. Stud. 2005;42(8):1621–1644
  15. McEvoy P, Richards D. Critical realism: a way forward for evaluation research in nursing?. J. Adv. Nurs. 2003;43:411–420
  16. Kazi M. Realist Evaluation in Practice Health and Social Work. London: Sage Publications; 2003;
  17. C. Oroviogoicoechea, A realistic evaluation of the impact of a computerised information system on clinical practice: the nurses’ perspective, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Sheffield, UK, 2008.
  18. Bryman A, Cramer D. Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS 12 and 13. Hove, East Sussex: Routledge; 2005;
  19. Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 1992;1:155–159
  20. Loehlin JC. Latent Variable Models: An Introduction to Factor, Path, and Structural Equation Analysis. 4th ed.. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004;
  21. Cramer D. Advanced Quantitative Data Analysis. Philadelphia: McGraw-Hill Education; 2003;
  22. Muijs D. Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. London: Sage Publications; 2004;
  23. Currie LM. Evaluation frameworks for nursing informatics. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2005;74:908–916
  24. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 2003;27(3):425–478
  25. Chiasson M, Reddy M, Kaplan B, Davidson E. Expanding multi-disciplinary approaches to healthcare information technologies: what does information systems offer medical informatics?. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2007;76S:S89–S97
  26. Carlsson SA. Using critical realism in IS research. In:  Whitman ME,  Woszczynski AB editor. The Handbook of Information Systems Research. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing Ltd.; 2004;
  27. Jenkings KN. Problems encountered in integrated care records research. Health Informatics J. 2004;10(4):314–324

PII: S1386-5056(09)00132-4

doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.08.008

International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 78, Issue 12 , Pages 839-849 , December 2009