International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 79, Issue 6 , Pages 391-400 , June 2010

Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of “web 2.0”: An inter-disciplinary literature and website review

Received 13 January 2009 ,Revised 13 January 2010 ,Accepted 13 January 2010.

References 

  1. Impicciatore P, Pandolfini C, Casella N, Bonati M. Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. BMJ. 1997;314:1875–1881
  2. Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling and filtering of information. BMJ. 1998;317:1496–1500
  3. Gottlieb S. Health information on the internet is often unreliable. BMJ. 2000;321:136
  4. Kiley R. Quackery on the Web. Health Information on the Internet. 2000;June 9–10
  5. Eysenbach G. An ontology of quality initiatives and a model for decentralized, collaborative quality management on the (semantic) world wide web. J. Med. Int. Res. 2001;3(4):e34;Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2001/4/e34, last accessed: 20 January 2008
  6. Eysenbach G. Infodemiology: the epidemiology of (mis-)information. Am. J. Med. 2002;113(9):763–765
  7. Kiley R. Some evidence exists that the internet does harm health. BMJ. 2002;324:238
  8. Meric F, Bernstam EV, Mirza NQ, Hunt KK, Ames FC, Ross MI, et al. Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites. BMJ. 2002;324:577–581
  9. Bernstam EV, Shelton DM, Walji M, Meric-Bernstam F. Instruments to assess the quality of health information on the world wide web: what can our patients actually use?. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2005;74(1):13–19
  10. Adams SA. Under Construction: Reviewing and Producing Information Reliability on the Web [Dissertation]. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Erasmus Medical Centre; 2006;
  11. Abraham J, Reddy M. Quality of healthcare websites: a comparison of a general-purpose vs. domain-specific search engine. In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium of the American Medical Informatics Association. Chicago, Il, November 10–14. 2007;p. 858
  12. Hsu W, Bath PA. Development of a patient-oriented tool for evaluating the quality of breast cancer information on the internet. In:  Andersen SK editors. eHealth Beyond the Horizon—Get IT There, Stud. Health Technol. Inform. vol. 136:2008;p. 297–302
  13. O’Grady L. Future directions for depicting credibility in health care web sites. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2006;75(1):58–65
  14. Kamel Boulos MN, Maramba I, Wheeler S. Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Med. Educ. 2006;6(August):41
  15. Childs S. Editorial: blogging for health. Health Inform. Internet. 2005;45:1–2
  16. Goldman KD, Schmalz KJ. Charlotte's web: why and how to create personal web sites and blogs. Health Promot. Pract. 2007;8(1):13–15
  17. McIntosh S. Blogs: has their time finally come—or gone?. Global Media Commun. 2005;1(5):385–388
  18. Oransky I. Cancer blogs. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(11):838–839
  19. McLean R, Richards BH, Wardman JI. The effect of Web 2.0 on the future of medical practice and education: darwikinian evolution or folksonomic revolution?. Med. J. Aust. 2007;187(August (3)):174–177
  20. Tsai C, Tsai SH, Zeng-Treitler Q, Liang BA. Patient-centered consumer health social network websites: a pilot study of quality of user-generated health information. In: Proceedings of the Annual Symposium of the American Medical Informatics Association. Chicago, Il, November 10–14. 2007;p. 1137
  21. Keen A. The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet is Killing Our Culture. New York: Doubleday; 2007;
  22. Adams SA, de Bont AA. More than just a mouse click: research into work practices behind the assignment of medical trust marks on the world wide web. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2007;76(Suppl. 1):s14–s20
  23. Adams SA, de Bont AA, Berg M. Looking for answers, constructing reliability: an exploration into how Dutch patients “check” web-based health information. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2006;75(1):66–72
  24. Nettleton S, Burrows R, O’Malley L. The mundane realities of the everyday lay use of the internet for health, and their consequences for media convergence. Sociol. Health Ill. 2005;27(7):972–992
  25. Scopus [Database on the Internet], Elsevier Publishing (US), New York, NY, C2008, Available from: http://www.info.scopus.com, last accessed: 27 October 2008.
  26. PubMed [Database on the Internet], National Library of Medicine (US), Bethesda, MD, Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/, last accessed: 27 October 2008.
  27. Google Scholar [Database on the Internet], Google (US), Mountain View, CA, C2009, Available from: http://scholar.google.com, last accessed: 27 October 2008.
  28. Alsever J, Durst S, Borzo J, Datta S. Health Care 2.0: Do-it-yourself Medical Services. Business 2. 0 Magazine. 2006;Available from: http://money.cnn.com/2006/10/10/magazines/business2/health2.0_intro.biz2/index.htm, last accessed: 27 February 2007
  29. Health 2.0 Conference: User-generated Healthcare [Homepage on the Internet], Health 2.0 Conference, San Francisco, Available from: http://www.health2con.com/, last accessed: 8 September 2009.
  30. G. Eysenbach, Medicine 2.0 Congress Website Launched (and: Definition of Medicine 2.0/Health 2.0), Gunther Eysenbach's Random Research Rants (Blog), Available Online: http://gunther-eysenbach.blogspot.com/2008/03/medicine-20-congress-website-launched.html, last accessed: 20 June 2008.
  31. Houtekamer C. Blogs uit het lab [Dutch: Blogs from the lab]. NRC Handelsblad [Dutch National Business Newspaper]; 2008;January 19
  32. Herring SC, Scheidt LA, Bonus S, Wright E. Weblogs as bridging genre. Inform. Technol. People. 2005;18(2):142–171
  33. Scholz T. Market Ideology and the Myths of Web 2.0. First Monday. 2008;13(March 3):available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2138/1945, last accessed: 9 May 2008
  34. Allen M. Web 2.0: an argument against convergence. First Monday. 2008;13(March (3)):Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2139/1946, last accessed: 9 May 2008
  35. Anderson P. What is Web 2.0? Ideas, Technologies and Implications for Education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch; 2007;February
  36. Berners-Lee T. Podcast of Interview With IBM. 2006;Transcript available from: http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/podcast/dwi/cm-int082206.txt, last accessed: 12 January 2009
  37. Silver D. History, hype and hope: an afterward. First Monday. 2008;13(March (3)):Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2143/1950, last accessed: 9 May 2008
  38. T. O’Reilly, What is web 2.0 Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software [Homepage on the Internet] 2005 30 (September), available from: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html, last accessed: 2 April 2008.
  39. Witteman H, O’Grady L. E-health in the era of web 2.0. In: Proceedings of the Virtually Informed: The Internet as (new) Health Information Sources, Final Conference of the Project Virtually Informed—The Internet in the Medical Field. The University of Vienna, Vienna, 25–26 January. 2008;p. 104–120
  40. Sarahson-Kahn J. The wisdom of patients: health care meets online social media. In: Report Prepared for the California Healthcare Foundation. April. 2008;
  41. Birnsteel L, Hoeksma J, Grätzel P. Web 2.0 in the Health Sector: Industry Review with UK Perspective. London: E-health Media; 2008;
  42. Karkalis GI, Koutsouris DD. E-health and the web 2.0. In: Proceedings of the ITAB. 2006;Available from: http://medlab.cs.uoi.gr/itab2006/proceedings/eHealth/124.pdf, last accessed: 8 September 2009
  43. Giustini D. How web 2.0 is changing medicine. BMJ. 2006;333:1283–1284
  44. Kamel Boulos MN, Wheeler S. The emerging web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Inform. Libr. J. 2007;24(1):2–23
  45. Blood R. How blogging software reshapes the online community. Commun. ACM. 2004;47(12):53–55
  46. Adams SA. Using blogging tools to help individuals record their experiences: an exploration and review of two commercial web applications in the Netherlands. In:  Westbook J editors. Information Technology in Health Care 2007, Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 130:2007;p. 193–203
  47. Bruns A. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and Beyond: From Production to Produsage. New York: Peter Lang; 2008;
  48. Nardi B, Schiano D, Gumbrecht M, Swartz L. Why we blog. Commun. ACM. 2004;47(12):41–46
  49. Nardi BA, Schiano DJ, Gumbrecht M. Blogging as a social activity, or, would you let 900 million people read your diary?. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 6 (3). New York: ACM Press; 2004;p. 222–231
  50. MacDougall R. Identity, electronic ethos and blogs. Am. Behav. Sci. 2005;49(December (4)):575–599
  51. Zimmer M. Preface: Critical Perspectives on Web 2.0. First Monday. 2008;13(March):Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2137/1943, last accessed 12 January 2009
  52. Deshpande A, Jadad AR. Web 2.0: could it help move the health system into the 21st century?. JMHG. 2006;3(December (4)):332–336
  53. Hargittai E. The changing online landscape: from free-for-all to commercial gatekeeping. In:  Day P,  Schuler D editor. Community Practice in the Network Society: Local Actions/Global Interaction. New York: Routledge; 2004;p. 66–76
  54. Henwood F, Wyatt S, Hart A, Smith J. “Ignorance is bliss sometimes”: constraints on the emergence of the “informed patient” in the changing landscapes of health information. Sociol. Health Ill. 2003;25(6):589–607
  55. Eysenbach G. Credibility of health information and digital media: new perspectives and implications for youth. In:  Metzger MJ,  Flanagin AJ editor. Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 2008;p. 123–154
  56. S.A. Adams, Blog-based applications and health information: two case studies that illustrate important questions for Consumer Health Informatics (CHI) research, Int. J. Med. Inform., in press.
  57. Zimmer M. The externalities of search 2.0: The emerging privacy threats when the drive for the perfect search engine meets web 2.0. First Monday. 2008;13(March):Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2136/1944, last accessed: 9 May 2008.
  58. Goetz T. Practicing Patients. The New York Times; 2008;Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/23/magazine/23patients-t.html, last accessed: 23 March 2008
  59. Zimmer M. The Faustian Bargain with web 2.0. First Monday Podcast [Monthly Online Audio Program]. 2008 April;Transcript Available from: http://www.firstmondaypodcast.org/transcripts/transcript_apr08.htm, last accessed: 12 January 2009
  60. Albrechtslund A. Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday. 2008;13(March):Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2142/1949, last accessed: 9 May 2008
  61. Hart K. The rise of alter egos in everybody's space: after oversharing, users recast their online personas. Washington Post. 2008;(May):D01
  62. EurActiv.com [homepage on the internet], Web 2.0: New Opportunities, New Risks, 2008 April 17, Available from: http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/web-20-new-opportunities-new-risks/article-171600, last accessed: 9 June 2008.
  63. Cormode C, Krishnamurthy R. Key Differences Between web 1.0 and web 2.0. First Monday. 2008;13(June):Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2125/1972, last accessed: 6 August 2008
  64. David S, Pinch T. Six degrees of reputation: the use and abuse of online review and recommendation systems. First Monday. 2006;11(March):Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/1315/1235, last accessed: 9 June 2008
  65. Frost JH, Massagli MP. Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: what can happen when patients have access to one another's data. J. Med. Int. Res. 2008;10(3):e15;Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2008/3/e15, last accessed: 6 August 2008
  66. Wang Y, Liu Z. Automatic detecting indicators for quality of health information on the Web. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2007;76(8):575–582
  67. Zegelgezond [Internet], Dutch, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Mediavedi B.V., available from: http://www.zegelgezond.nl, last accessed: 8 September 2009.
  68. Deshpande A, Jadad A. Trying to measure the quality of health information on the internet: is it time to move on?. J. Rheumatol. 2009;36(1):1–3
  69. Eysenbach G. Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation and openness. J. Med. Internet Res. 2008;10(August (3)):e22
  70. G. Eysenbach, [Weblog] Available from: http://gunther-eysenbach.blogspot.com, last accessed: 6 March 2008.
  71. Jadad AR. Promoting partnerships: challenges for the internet age. BMJ. 1999;319(7212):761–764
  72. Rigby M, Forsstrom J, Roberts R, Wyatt J. Verifying quality and safety in health informatics services. BMJ. 2001;323(7312):552–556
  73. Fogg BJ, Soohoo C, Danielsen D, Marable L, Stanford J, Tauber ER. How do people evaluate a web site's credibility? Results from a large study. In: Report from the Stanford University Persuasive Technology Lab, Consumer Web Watch, and Sliced Bread Design. 2002;October
  74. Stanford J, Tauber ER, Fogg BJ, Marable L. Experts versus online consumers: a comparative credibility study of health and finance websites. In: Report from Sliced Bread Design, the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab and Consumer Web Watch. 2002;October
  75. Peterson G, Aslani P, Williams KA. How do consumers search for and appraise information on medicines on the internet? A qualitative study using focus groups. J. Med. Internet Res. 2003;5(4):e33;Available online: last accessed: 2 January 2005
  76. Health on the Net website [Internet] . The HONcode in Brief. Geneva, Switzerland: Health on the Net; 2009;http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Webmasters/Conduct.html, last accessed: 11 September 2009
  77. Petersen SM. Loser generated content: from participation to exploitation. First Monday. 2008;13(March):Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2141/1948, last accessed: 9 May 2008
  78. Genes N. Diabetes patient offers goldmine of information and support. Medscape Med. Stud. 2006;8;Available from: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/544166, last accessed: 27 November 2006
  79. Thorsen E. Journalistic objectivity redefined? Wikinews and the neutral point of view. New Media Soc. 2008;10:935–954
  80. B. Aichinger, [Weblog] Available from: http://ehealthaustria.blogspot.com/, last accessed: 6 March 2008.
  81. Berendt B, Navigli N. Finding your way through blogspace: using semantics for cross-domain blog analysis. In: AAAI Symposium on Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs. Stanford University, CA, 27–29 March. 2006;Available from: http://www.dsi.uniroma1.it/∼navigli/pubs/SSS_2006_Berendt_Navigli.pdf, last accessed: 12 January 2009
  82. Bhatt J. Blogging as a tool: innovative approaches to information access. Library Hi Tech News. 2005;9:28–31
  83. Chesanow N. Doctors and “blogs.”. Med. Econ. 2004;81(August):33
  84. Fujiki T, Nanno T, Okumura M. Differences between blogs and web diaries. In: Proceedings of the WWW2005. Chiba, Japan, May 10–14. 2005;
  85. Herring SC, Scheidt LA, Bonus S, Wright E. Bridging the gap: a genre analysis of weblogs, Bridging the gap: a genre analysis of weblogs. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawai’i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-37). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press; 2005;Available from: http://www.blogninja.com/DDGDD04.doc, last accessed: 8 September 2009
  86. D. Hinchcliffe, [Weblog] Web 2.0 Blog, C2005–2008, Hinchcliffe and Company, Alexandria, VA, Available from: http://web2.socialcomputingmagazine.com/, last accessed: 12 January 2009.
  87. Hughes B, Joshi I, Wareham J. Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: tensions and controversies in the field. J. Med. Int. Res. 2008;10(3):e23
  88. Jarrett K. Interactivity is evil! A critical investigation of web 2.0. First Monday. 2008;13(March):Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2140/1947, last accessed: 15 April 2008
  89. B. Klepper, J. Sarasohn-Kahn, A Broad Vision of Health 2.0: Reformulating Data for Transparency, Decision Support & Revitalized Health Care Markets [White Paper Posted on a Wiki], Available from: http://health20.org/wiki?title=Klepper-Kahn_Health_2.0_Whitepaper&printable=yes, last accessed: 12 January 2009.
  90. Baoill AR. Conceptualizing the weblog: Understanding what it is in order to understand what it may be interfacings. J. Contemp. Media Stud. 2004;Available from: http://www.comm.uiuc.edu/icr/interfacings, last accessed: 26 November 2006
  91. Pomerantz J, Stutzman F. Collaborative reference work in the blogosphere. Ref. Serv. Rev. 2006;34(2):200–212
  92. Rainie L. The State of Blogging, Pew Internet and American Life Data Memo. 2005;Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org, last accessed: 12 January 2009
  93. Ramos M, Piper PS. Letting the grass grow: grassroots information on blogs and wikis. Ref. Serv. Rev. 2006;34(4):570–574
  94. J.W. Sharp, [Weblog] Available from: http://ehealth.johnwsharp.com/, last accessed: 27 March 2008.
  95. A. Albrechtslund, [Weblog] Available from: http://www.albrechtslund.net, last accessed: 26 June 2007.
  96. Health 2.0 Wiki Main Page [Internet], Available from: http://www.health20.org/wiki/Main_Page, last accessed 12 December 2008.
  97. Wichowski A. Survival of the fittest tag: folksonomies, findability, and the evolution of information organization. First Monday. 2009;14(May):Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2447/2175, last accessed: 10 September 2009

PII: S1386-5056(10)00019-5

doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.01.006

International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 79, Issue 6 , Pages 391-400 , June 2010

Article Tools