International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 79, Issue 6 , Pages 401-411, June 2010

Nurses’ acceptance of Smart IV pump technology

  • Pascale Carayon

      Affiliations

    • Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement (CQPI), UW-Madison, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, UW-Madison, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 3126 Engineering Centers Building, 1515 Engineering Drive, Madison, WI 53706-1609, USA. Tel.: +1 608 265 0503/3 2520; fax: +1 608 263 1425.
  • ,
  • Ann Schoofs Hundt

      Affiliations

    • Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement (CQPI), UW-Madison, USA
  • ,
  • Tosha B. Wetterneck

      Affiliations

    • Center for Quality and Productivity Improvement (CQPI), UW-Madison, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, USA

Received 2 December 2009; received in revised form 3 February 2010; accepted 5 February 2010. published online 11 March 2010.

Abstract 

Background

“Smart” intravenous infusion pumps (Smart IV pumps) are increasingly being implemented in hospitals to reduce medication administration errors.

Objectives

This study examines nurses’ experience with the implementation and use of a Smart IV pump in an academic hospital.

Method

Data were collected in three longitudinal surveys: (a) a pre-implementation survey, (b) a 6-week-post-implementation survey, and (c) a 1-year-post-implementation survey. We examined: (a) the technology implementation process, (b) technical performance of the pump, (c) usability of the pump, and (d) user acceptance of the pump.

Results

Initially, nurses had a somewhat positive acceptance of the Smart IV pump technology that significantly increased one year after implementation. User experiences associated with the pump in general improved over time, especially perceptions of pump efficiency. However, user experience with the pump implementation process and pump technical performance did not consistently improve from the pre-implementation survey to the post-implementation survey. Several characteristics of pump technical performance and usability influenced user acceptance at the one-year post-implementation survey.

Discussion

These data may be useful for other institutions to guide implementation and post-implementation follow-up of IV pump use; other institutions could use the survey instrument from this study to evaluate nurses’ perceptions of the technology. Our study identified several characteristics of the implementation process that other institutions may need to pay attention to (e.g., sharing information about the implementation process with nurses).

Keywords: Infusion pump, Acceptance process, Safety management, Smart IV pump technology, User acceptance, Nurses, Survey

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1386-5056(10)00040-7

doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.02.001

International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 79, Issue 6 , Pages 401-411, June 2010