Next »
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 79, Issue 7
, Pages 469-477
, July 2010
Issues and questions to consider in implementing secure electronic patient–provider web portal communications systems
References
- . Patient experiences and attitudes about access to a patient electronic health care record and linked web messaging. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2004;11(6):505–513
- . The Kaiser permanente electronic health record: transforming and streamlining modalities of care. Health Affairs (Millwood). 2009;28(2):323–333
- . Group health cooperative's transformation toward patient-centered access. Med. Care Res. Rev. 2009;66(6):703–724
- . Diabetes quality of care and outpatient utilization associated with electronic patient–provider messaging: a cross-sectional analysis. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(7):1182–1187
- . Lesson learned from pilot site implementation of an ambulatory electronic health record. Proc. Bayl. Univ. Med. Cent. 2006;19(4):303–310
- . Initial experience with patient–clinician secure messaging at a VA medical center. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2009;16(2):267–270
- . Interest in the use of computerized patient portals: role of the provider–patient relationship. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2008;23(Suppl. 1):20–26
- . The impact of patient–physician web messaging on healthcare service provision. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2008;77(1):17–23
- . The emerging role of online communication between patients and their providers. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2004;19(9):978–983
- . Experiences of patients who were early adopters of electronic communication with their physician: satisfaction, benefits and concerns. Am. J. Manage. Care. 2004;10(9):601–608
- . An internet-based patient–provider communication system: randomized controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2005;7:e47
- . Impact of electronic messaging on the patient-physician interaction. J. Telemed. Telecare. 2009;15(5):243–250
- . Results of a content analysis of electronic messages (email) sent between patients and their physicians. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Making. 2003;3:11
- . Enhancing doctor–patient communication using email: a pilot study. J. Am. Board Family Pract. 2005;18(3):180–188
- . Impact of an automated test results management system on patients’ satisfaction about test result communication. Arch. Intern. Med. 2007;167(20):2233–2239
- . Patient web services integrated with a shared medical record: patient use and satisfaction. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007;14(6):798–806
- . Web messaging: a new tool for patient–physician communication. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2003;10(3):260–270
- . Providing a web-based online medical record with electronic communication capabilities to patients with congestive heart failure: randomized trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2004;6(May (2)):e12
- . Patient satisfaction with a web-based patient–provider messaging system implemented across a statewide delivery system (Group Health Cooperative). In: AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc.. 2003;p. 860
- . Web portals in primary care: an evaluation of patient readiness and willingness to pay for online services. J. Med. Internet Res. 2006;8(4):e26
- . Patient/physician online communication: many patients want it, would pay for it, and it would influence their choice of doctors and health plans. Health Care News. 2002;2(8):1–4
- . Patients’ interest in reading their medical record: relation with clinical and sociodemographic characteristics and patients’ approach to health care. Arch. Intern. Med. 2004;164(7):793–800
- . Value versus user fees: perspectives of patients before and after using a web-based portal of management of diabetes. Telemed. J. E: Health. 2008;14(10):1035–1043
- . Patient and physician attitudes regarding electronic communications in pediatric practices. Pediatrics. 2002;109(5):740–744
- . Patient portals: survey of nursing informaticists. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2009;146:160–165
- . Electrons in flight—e-mail between doctors and patients. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;350(17):1705–1707
- . Crossing the digital divide: evaluating online communication between patients and their providers. Am. J. Manage. Care. 2004;10(9):593–598
- . A content analysis of E-mail communication between patients and their providers: patients get the message. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2004;11(4):260–267
- . E-mail communications in primary care: what are patients’ expectations for specific test results?. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2005;74(January (1)):21–30
- . A survey of patient–provider e-mail communication: what do patients think?. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2001;61(1):71–80
- . Privacy vs. usability: a qualitative exploration of patients’ experiences with secure internet communication with their general practitioner. J. Med. Internet Res. 2005;7(2):e15
- . Effect of a triage-based e-mail system on clinic resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2003;18(9):736–744
- . The impact of patient–physician web messaging on provider productivity. J. Healthcare Inform. Manage. 2005;19(2):81–86
- . A survey of GP attitudes to and experiences of email consultations. Inform. Prim. Care. 2004;12(4):201–206
- . Primary care physician attitudes towards using a secure web-based portal designed to facilitate electronic communication with patients. Inform. Prim. Care. 2004;12(3):129–138
- . Opportunities to enhance patient and physician e-mail contact. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2003;70(1):1–9
- . Patient use of secure electronic messaging within a shared medical record: a cross-sectional study. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2009;24(3):349–355
- . Patient access to an electronic health record with secure messaging: impact on primary care utilization. Am. J. Manage. Care. 2007;13(7):418–424
- . Can e-mail messages between patients and physicians be patient-centered?. Health Commun. 2008;23(1):80–86
- . Practice-linked online personal health records for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch. Intern. Med. 2008;168(16):1776–1782
- . Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, web communication, and pharmacist care on hypertension control: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299(24):2857–2867
- . Electronic patient–provider communication: will it offset office visits and telephone consultations in primary care?. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2005;74(9):705–710
- . Effects of E-health on health care service production processes-case study: Palo alto online. In: International Conference on the Management of Healthcare & Medical Technology. Aalborg, Denmark, August 25–26. 2005;p. 62–73
- . Pilot study of an internet patient–physician communication tool for heart failure disease management. J. Med. Internet Res. 2005;7(1):e8
- . A content analysis of e-mail communication between primary care providers and parents. Pediatrics. 2005;115(5):1283–1288
- . Sharing electronic laboratory results in a patient portal—a feasibility pilot. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2007;129(Pt 1):18–22
- . Exploring challenges and potentials of personal health records in diabetes self-management: implementation and initial assessment. Telemed. J. E: Health. 2007;13(5):509–517
- . Usability testing finds problems for novice users of pediatric portals. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2009;16(5):660–669
- . One size does not fit all: using qualitative methods to inform the development of an internet portal for Multiple Sclerosis patients. In: AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc., vols. 16–20. 2005;
- . Access to web-based personalized antenatal health records for pregnant women: a randomized controlled trial. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 2008;30(1):38–43
- . How effective is email communication for patients requiring elective surgery?. ANZ J. Surg. 2005;75(8):680–683
- . Email consultations in health care. 2. Acceptability and safe application. BMJ. 2004;329(7463):439–442
- . Developing a shared electronic health record for patients and clinicians. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2008;136:57–62
- Office of Health Information Technology, Meaningful Use, http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt?open=512&objID=1325&parentname=CommunityPage&parentid=1&mode=2 (accessed 12/10/09).
- . The patient–computer interview: a neglected tool that can aid the clinician. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2003;78(1):67–78
PII: S1386-5056(10)00094-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.04.005
© 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Next »
International Journal of Medical Informatics
Volume 79, Issue 7
, Pages 469-477
, July 2010
